Ian Hogarth on live music      

I went to the Open Music Media meeting in London last night, and thought you might be interested in a chat I had with Ian Hogarth from Songkick, which more or less summarises the presentation he gave on the night.

Kind of impressed with my new Flip Ultra video camera too – audible sound in a really noisy environment. Having some codec trouble playing the clips back in VLC on the macbook – but I’ve figured out the Quicktime problem I was having…


No Trackbacks

You can leave a trackback using this URL: http://newmusicstrategies.com/2009/02/05/ian-hogarth-on-live-music/trackback/

18 Comments

  1. Cool video man, tempting to buy this little gadget as I love taking backstage band videos and pretty much anything and everything on my youtube channel.

    Posted February 5, 2009 at 2:59 pm | Permalink
  2. Andrew,

    Great interview. Thanks for sharing this.

    Posted February 5, 2009 at 3:33 pm | Permalink
  3. Very intersting post.
    Always good to get a third party perspective on the industry as a whole and know that it is possible for small fish like myself to get noticed.
    Cheers

    Posted February 5, 2009 at 3:54 pm | Permalink
  4. Thanks for the interview. I hadn’t heard of Songkick before today and I hope they get huge. But I think he flipped you off at 2:37. ;)

    Posted February 5, 2009 at 5:36 pm | Permalink
  5. Anthony

    Andrew,

    The innovation and creative thinking made possible by the Internet never ceases to amaze me. Songkick sounds like an interesting idea. I’ll definitely check them out thanks to your video. Great stuff, mate.;-)

    Regards,
    Anthony

    Posted February 5, 2009 at 6:15 pm | Permalink
  6. @Graham – you’re correct, I did flip him off :)

    Posted February 5, 2009 at 9:53 pm | Permalink
  7. lol In your defense, his questions were keeping you from your beer.

    Posted February 5, 2009 at 9:57 pm | Permalink
  8. Songkick seems like a cool idea.

    Sometimes it’s staggering to hear those statistics, but Ian was also very encouraging so that was pretty cool.

    Posted February 6, 2009 at 6:37 am | Permalink
  9. Really interesting interview and thanks for the Scala mention Ian.

    Posted February 6, 2009 at 12:06 pm | Permalink
  10. Andrew,

    Songkick is brilliant Ian! Andrew I’m not sure if this is in response to my email but thanks. This does help me out a bit…

    -Hakim

    Posted February 6, 2009 at 1:36 pm | Permalink
  11. 10,000 – 20,000 bands that make enough money to make a living out of it. Interesting stat actually. There must be millions after this peak in a “long tail” type of way.

    I wish getting a manager would would be that easy for my band. If only I had a penny for everytime someone gave me that suggestion when I am ranting in the pub on how difficult all this stuff is :-)

    On the plus side “this is the internet, if it is good it will be discovered” is something I do obviously believe in still.

    Posted February 7, 2009 at 12:54 pm | Permalink
  12. Great interview – nice one for posting.

    Posted February 9, 2009 at 10:07 am | Permalink
  13. Ken Hiatt

    Great interview, Andrew. Thanks. I’m interested in learning more about the analysis Ian did to figure out how much bands have to make in order to earn a living, and how that translates to myspace views. I couldn’t find his email on the Songkick page. Maybe a guest post here? Thanks

    Posted February 11, 2009 at 10:21 pm | Permalink
  14. I’m interested to know if the Flip Ultra would be good for capturing songs for my blog posts – so after investigating it over here I’ve taken a chance and bought one so will let you know!

    I figure I can have a friend video a song at one of my gigs and then upload to youtube and post it on my blog; or I can do one myself in my music room. Either way can’t go wrong for the price. If the quality isn’t GREATgreat I can always upgrade as I grow. . .The hook for me is that the sound quality is good at close range. The sound quality is poor on my current camera and same with my phone. Since I already have a digital camera I don’t my the Flip Ultra not having a stills option (although you can extract stills from the video).

    Will come back to let you know how it goes.
    Bye for now, Nancy

    Posted February 14, 2009 at 10:28 pm | Permalink
  15. hi andrew, i see on your twitter page you are heading to NZ at the moment – how long are you down here for and are you doing any seminars or lectures? It would be great to attend one of your engagements if you have anything like that lined up.

    Posted February 18, 2009 at 9:08 pm | Permalink
  16. Songkick sounds like a brilliant idea and this fellow sounds like he knows what he’s talking about. Make great music and people will spread the word.

    Posted March 1, 2009 at 3:59 am | Permalink
  17. TonsoTunez

    I find it interesting that today so many people, usually those who don’t perform, think that the be all and end all for tomorrow’s musicians will be live performances … that opportunities to perform live will be so enhanced due to the tools available on the Net that musicians will be able to ‘make a living’ even if all other traditional sources of income are severely reduced or disappear entirely thanks to technology.

    First of all, I would like someone to define ‘making a living’ in monetary terms, and then, I would like to know just how long – in this era of ‘click to delete’ disposable music – artists should be lead to believe they can make this so-called, ‘living..

    Nextly, I would like to know just where the 10 to 20,000 artists Andrew mentions are going to play? Where are all of these venues that are going to book these people … and the 10 to 20,000 that will be coming in right behind them. They don’t exist. Come on, there is no room out there for today’s wannabes to live the dream of ‘making a living’ playing shit holes.

    I personally know a lot of mid line name brand ‘road warriors’ that have performed in little clubs for years that still have to fight to get booked and get paid. They hate it. Their ex wives hate it because they can’t keep up the alimony payments. They can’t keep bands together because what they get paid – if they get paid – rarely covers the overhead of getting to the gig.

    Playing live in awful clubs is only exiting for the first few of years if you are young and believe playing clubs might lead to something else that will get you out of playing clubs.

    Let’s be honest, the Net is unlikely to produce many mid line name brand acts and certainly won’t produce ANY arena acts … Once our current group of big name attractions hangs it up … there will be no more… unless hope can be restored that there might be something beyond playing live and just ‘making a living.’

    The question musicians should be asking themselves isn’t ‘can I make a living’ doing this — the question is – given today’s realities – can I build a life… can I come out this after 40 years with enough money in the bank to retire, provide health care for myself and my family and leave a few bucks to the kids?

    Given everything technology is forcing musicians to give up … I think anyone who is seriously considering a life in music will conclude is that answer to those questions is probably, ‘No.’

    Hey, music has had a great run since the ability to make recordings was invented … It had to end sometime … My guess is that time is now… unless consumers begin to understand and encourage musicians and unless musicians can somehow regain that feeling that the hard work required to achieve greatness might provide a little more in the way of financial rewards than just making a living.

    Posted March 2, 2009 at 5:39 am | Permalink
  18. AntiHate

    Interesting article. And great point Tonsotunez. The music business is not for everybody. You either are great or your just as ‘good as my brother, boyfriend, cousin, girlfriend, sister, uncle, aunt who also do music.’ You can’t just be very good anymore. You have to be special for anyone to care. Just my take on it.

    Posted March 4, 2009 at 3:16 pm | Permalink

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*