What websites should I be on? (Part 2)

Last.Image via WikipediaI used to joke that the way to be successful in the music industry was to look at whatever the major labels were up to, and simply do the opposite. It’s getting to the point where that’s not really a joke anymore. I learned yesterday that Warner Music have pulled their catalogue from Last.fm. This, if nothing else, is confirmation of the wisdom that this is exactly where your music should be.

Now, it’s possible that Warner’s catalogue isn’t benefiting as greatly from Last.fm as an independent might. Last.fm users tend to be quite active music hobbyists - not in the majority, but certainly in greater proportion to most sites. And independent music enthusiasts tend to be disproportionately represented amongst active music consumers.

Put simply, people who are more discerning about their music tend to look outside the mainstream hits. People who are more discerning about their music tend to be more active about discovering new music. Last.fm encourages an active engagement with the process of music consumption.

In fact, I’d argue that more than almost any other music site out there, Last.fm understands how people consume music.

Understanding music consumption
Remember that consumption of music is not simply about the acts of discovery, purchasing and listening to music.

Music consumers do far more with their music. They collect, they organise, they make sense of it and connect different parts of their music to others, they talk about it and recommend it to their friends - and they even build hierarchies of status and esteem based on musical knowledge and taste-making.

Whether by accident or design, Last.fm seems to understand and take advantage of this fact, and the fact that people’s music tastes are, more often than not, fairly eclectic.

They give the users tools with which to talk about music they love, connect with other people who also love the music that they love, engage through that music consumption - and even build communities based around shared interests and expertise. All within what some (I would argue mistakenly) consider to be simply an internet radio portal.

Hear, Like, Buy
There are a number of reasons that I recommend to the labels I consult that they upload their catalogues to Last.fm. The most obvious one is the fact that it allows people to hear their music, and then gives them an obvious and direct link to buy it.

Last.fm will not only play your music to people as part of their listening streams, but it will also recommend it to people who are already predisposed to liking it, based on what else they already listen to - both on Last.fm and from their own mp3 collection.

You can even pay a bit of extra money to get your music heard by people who like other music that you identify with. Kind of like payola, but legal, much more ethical and far more affordable.

Stream whole tracks
Last.fm will, at your discretion (and I’d advise taking them up on it), allow users to stream whole tracks of your music on demand. They have proof that it leads to more sales.

I mean, you and I knew intuitively that it was true - but they have the numbers.

Another wiki opportunity
But there’s more to Last.fm than a streaming player. The artist pages are, like all such things should probably be by now, wikis. That means that just like Wikipedia, anyone can update, amend and correct an artist’s information page.

The importance of this should not be overlooked. Your bio and discography can be just as accurate, comprehensive and up to date as anyone’s. And the fact that you can throw your YouTube videos in there as well is a bonus. Some people like colour and movement.

Last.fm wins on points
It may not be - as some have pointed out - the most popular online destination for music. But it’s disproportionately more effective. I

n fact, I’d put it in my top 10 sites that all serious musicians should engage with. It’s targeted, audience-friendly, social, lends itself to both viral activity within the site, and search engine optimisation (ie: it’s a good place to be ‘found’).

If your music is not already on Last.fm - go make sure it is.

Zemanta Pixie



If you found this post interesting or helpful, you may wish to subscribe to
New Music Strategies in your feed reader. Click the orange button.



8 Comments, Comment or Ping

  1. hey andrew-

    i’ve been subscribed to your rss feed for a few months now. really enjoy reading your thought provoking articles, both here and on music think tank. just wanted to say i have been on last.fm for a few years now, but have not really taken advantage of it. in fact, i don’t think i have even signed in to my account in over a year! you inspired me to get re-involved in the service. i produce/manage a couple of artists, and i’m going to put their music up on the site as soon as possible…

  2. So would you recommend to put up all the tracks from a new album release as whole track streams or just some of them? And in what quality 128kb or 320 ? Personally I like to hear music in as good as possible quality even if it’s for pre-listening but maybe people will just stream instead of buy if the quality is the same?

  3. I found that someone had already started a page about me on last.fm so I went, signed up and then downloaded the Linux version of their software. It didn’t work (error said there were missing files).

    So I wrote their tech support, told them all of this and asked what I should do to fix it. All I got back was “you should go download the Linux version.”

    Hey, thanks for all the help, last.fm!

  4. Hi August,

    I can’t speak for others but I use Last.fm as a radio, I stream it all.

    Occasionally I will download something for review but as a rule it’s just on in the background.

    So 128k would be fine, it also gives you the 320k MP3’s to offer at your own site to gibe people a reason to come and have look.

    my two cents.

  5. Hey I really like the way you’ve blogged “What websites should I be on”. I agree, Last.fm’s good, but the average unsigned band is lost in the crowd. The best website for a band to be on is their own. So many bands do not have their own website! Why? Anyway, Last.fm would be in my top ten as well, third actually ;)

    luv
    ian

  6. Anti-Hate

    I love this post. Funny and informative. Keep it up. I visit your site virtually every day.

  7. Last.fm is pretty sweet actually. I was never sure what my band’s mucis was like for real until I put it up on last.fm. Obviously putting it there and hoping people come and randomly visit dosen’t quite work, which is where one of their cheap powerplay campaigns comes into play. You can target a 100 visitors for like £15 or something. Once you get that many visitors who are “offered” your music you automatically start finding a fanbase.

    Not only that but you often find that there are some people who actually litreally *love* your music and then even click on the “love this track” button.

    Even though my band only has three recorded tracks so far, putting just those three has been really fruitful :-)

    Atul from DonkeyBox
    http://www.donkeybox.co.uk

Reply to “What websites should I be on? (Part 2)”

ANDREW DUBBER