<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What websites should I be on? (Part 1)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newmusicstrategies.com/2008/06/04/what-websites-should-i-be-on-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newmusicstrategies.com/2008/06/04/what-websites-should-i-be-on-part-1/</link>
	<description>Music culture, strategy and thinking in the digital age</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:46:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://newmusicstrategies.com/2008/06/04/what-websites-should-i-be-on-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-6422</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 15:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmusicstrategies.com/?p=608#comment-6422</guid>
		<description>I noticed I have been referenced on a few notable artists wiki pages in name, does that qualify for notability?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed I have been referenced on a few notable artists wiki pages in name, does that qualify for notability?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to promote your night/gig/event online &#124; Chris Unitt</title>
		<link>http://newmusicstrategies.com/2008/06/04/what-websites-should-i-be-on-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-2140</link>
		<dc:creator>How to promote your night/gig/event online &#124; Chris Unitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 13:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmusicstrategies.com/?p=608#comment-2140</guid>
		<description>[...] What websites should I be on (and pt 2 and pt 3) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What websites should I be on (and pt 2 and pt 3) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://newmusicstrategies.com/2008/06/04/what-websites-should-i-be-on-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-2139</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmusicstrategies.com/?p=608#comment-2139</guid>
		<description>There was a very well-written and well-referenced article about my band posted yesterday and got already got pulled today for notability reasons. I strongly disagree that Wikipedia should be the first website your band SHOULD be on.

The self-appointed Wiki-police need to get lives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a very well-written and well-referenced article about my band posted yesterday and got already got pulled today for notability reasons. I strongly disagree that Wikipedia should be the first website your band SHOULD be on.</p>
<p>The self-appointed Wiki-police need to get lives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Newman</title>
		<link>http://newmusicstrategies.com/2008/06/04/what-websites-should-i-be-on-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-2127</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Newman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 15:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmusicstrategies.com/?p=608#comment-2127</guid>
		<description>Concerning notability. I had posted some info about our band a few years back and they pulled it with a polite note about the notability.

But there is a back door. If you find pages on other artists or subjects where you have respecable web pages to link to, then it&#039;s perfectly legit to add those links in the appropriate pages.

As far as feeling like it might not feel right ... well I don&#039;t understand that, as long as you keep anything you write to facts and history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Concerning notability. I had posted some info about our band a few years back and they pulled it with a polite note about the notability.</p>
<p>But there is a back door. If you find pages on other artists or subjects where you have respecable web pages to link to, then it&#8217;s perfectly legit to add those links in the appropriate pages.</p>
<p>As far as feeling like it might not feel right &#8230; well I don&#8217;t understand that, as long as you keep anything you write to facts and history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wikinomics &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Wikinomics in the Blogosphere</title>
		<link>http://newmusicstrategies.com/2008/06/04/what-websites-should-i-be-on-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-2132</link>
		<dc:creator>Wikinomics &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Wikinomics in the Blogosphere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 17:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmusicstrategies.com/?p=608#comment-2132</guid>
		<description>[...] DubberÃ‚Â lists WikinomicsÃ‚Â on his New Music Strategies blog as a website to read for aspiring [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] DubberÃ‚Â lists WikinomicsÃ‚Â on his New Music Strategies blog as a website to read for aspiring [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Bytesize Music Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Thoughts on Wikipedia for Artists</title>
		<link>http://newmusicstrategies.com/2008/06/04/what-websites-should-i-be-on-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-2135</link>
		<dc:creator>The Bytesize Music Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Thoughts on Wikipedia for Artists</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 15:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmusicstrategies.com/?p=608#comment-2135</guid>
		<description>[...] makes an interesting post over at New Music Strategies on the importance for artists and bands to be listed on Wikipedia. It&#8217;s not something that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] makes an interesting post over at New Music Strategies on the importance for artists and bands to be listed on Wikipedia. It&#8217;s not something that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Music of KevOz &#8212;&#62; Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What websites should I be on? (Part 1)</title>
		<link>http://newmusicstrategies.com/2008/06/04/what-websites-should-i-be-on-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-2134</link>
		<dc:creator>The Music of KevOz &#8212;&#62; Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What websites should I be on? (Part 1)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 14:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmusicstrategies.com/?p=608#comment-2134</guid>
		<description>[...] What websites should I be on? (Part 1) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What websites should I be on? (Part 1) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Pearce</title>
		<link>http://newmusicstrategies.com/2008/06/04/what-websites-should-i-be-on-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-2133</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Pearce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 09:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmusicstrategies.com/?p=608#comment-2133</guid>
		<description>Great advice about WIkipedia, but I&#039;d just like to repeat/re-inforce a point already made here - they do have notability guidelines, and I suspect that unless you can get enough people editing and updating your Wiki page, an editor will spot it an stick a notability &#039;order&#039; on it.

Mind you, I suppose if you can get enough contributers....

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great advice about WIkipedia, but I&#8217;d just like to repeat/re-inforce a point already made here &#8211; they do have notability guidelines, and I suspect that unless you can get enough people editing and updating your Wiki page, an editor will spot it an stick a notability &#8216;order&#8217; on it.</p>
<p>Mind you, I suppose if you can get enough contributers&#8230;.</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Fullerton</title>
		<link>http://newmusicstrategies.com/2008/06/04/what-websites-should-i-be-on-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-2136</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Fullerton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 08:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmusicstrategies.com/?p=608#comment-2136</guid>
		<description>Wonderful article, and spot on in my humble opinion. I have participated in a limited amount on wikipedia, and I have done one page for a blues harp player friend of mine. The most important thing to remember about wikipedia is the fact the website requires references from established magazines, newspapers, or something similar. However, you can&#039;t copy/paste straight from the articles because that creates a copyright violation. You have to do a write up and just use the material as references. The artist can not be quoted, unless it comes from an already published source.

Well worth the effort, but it&#039;s just that...an effort. And if the artist is just getting establishe, probably not the best place. But wikipedia is definitely a database not to be dismissed.

I participate in a an online collaborative wiki radio station Whole Wheat Radio.
http://wholewheatradio.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page

It&#039;s basically a wiki based Internet radio specifically for independent music. It&#039;s listener/artist based and both participate in building and maintaining the database and in the daily programming of the station. However, we&#039;re not near as strict as wikipedia! ;-) Wiki definitely has a learning curve, but it&#039;s here to stay and wikipedia has proven the popularity of grassroots, contributor oriented parking spaces on the web.

Always enjoy the information from &quot;New Music Strategies&quot;...great work and I hope to see you in my Reader for many, many years to come!

Randy Fullerton (a.k.a. atuuschaaw)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonderful article, and spot on in my humble opinion. I have participated in a limited amount on wikipedia, and I have done one page for a blues harp player friend of mine. The most important thing to remember about wikipedia is the fact the website requires references from established magazines, newspapers, or something similar. However, you can&#8217;t copy/paste straight from the articles because that creates a copyright violation. You have to do a write up and just use the material as references. The artist can not be quoted, unless it comes from an already published source.</p>
<p>Well worth the effort, but it&#8217;s just that&#8230;an effort. And if the artist is just getting establishe, probably not the best place. But wikipedia is definitely a database not to be dismissed.</p>
<p>I participate in a an online collaborative wiki radio station Whole Wheat Radio.<br />
<a href="http://wholewheatradio.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page" rel="nofollow">http://wholewheatradio.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s basically a wiki based Internet radio specifically for independent music. It&#8217;s listener/artist based and both participate in building and maintaining the database and in the daily programming of the station. However, we&#8217;re not near as strict as wikipedia! ;-) Wiki definitely has a learning curve, but it&#8217;s here to stay and wikipedia has proven the popularity of grassroots, contributor oriented parking spaces on the web.</p>
<p>Always enjoy the information from &#8220;New Music Strategies&#8221;&#8230;great work and I hope to see you in my Reader for many, many years to come!</p>
<p>Randy Fullerton (a.k.a. atuuschaaw)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milton</title>
		<link>http://newmusicstrategies.com/2008/06/04/what-websites-should-i-be-on-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-2137</link>
		<dc:creator>Milton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 02:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmusicstrategies.com/?p=608#comment-2137</guid>
		<description>I have been gathering information over the last couple of years about the benefits of building my own dedicated website.

Unfortunately I am not tech savvy enough to build the site myself...As a result, I have also been soliciting like minded peers who are tech savvy enough to help me.

Through this process I have learned several things:

1) I wish I had learned more about web design / HTML

2) Lots o my peers / friends are tech savvy, brilliant at it even.

3) Many of these people have sites, make great music but see no noticeable  results due to their domain.

and 4) The reason for this I think is because the social networks have gained prominence over dedicated sites (for many reasons).

Strictly regarding &quot;unknown&quot; artists:

The social networks offer all the functions of a dedicated site with the added advantage of built in traffic. They offer convenience  and there are several that are &quot;useful&quot; (as opposed to the multitude that are not) like Last FM, iMeem, Amie Street, and even Myspace.

For the artist without a budget beyond a few hundred dollars a year to spare, the social networks offer a realistic and promising alternative to domain anonymity.

Google offers the most legitimate of the &quot;free&quot; options for web pages or blogs thanks to the way they structure the domain listings, i.e.:

www.ultrameek.blogspot.com

or

www.ultrameek.googlepages.com

Sure their brand is in the listing but they had the foresight to put the artist / bloggers name first. Unlike Myspace and many others who stick it on the end.

My point in saying all this is that I believe that there are very economical ways to create a web presence for your music (especially if you are HTML deficient like me).

A dedicated domain is always the way to go if you are capable. These alternatives mentioned above give folks like me complete control over our content and schedule of implementation.

I am not suggesting in any way that total control equals a great web presence (just visit any of those URL&#039;s I posted!)...But that is the individuals responsibility to make it worthwhile...And I hope I develop those skills soon!

It is important to note: This is also the perspective of an artist with a full time day job, wife, and father of two with not a lot of time to spend making (much less) marketing music.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been gathering information over the last couple of years about the benefits of building my own dedicated website.</p>
<p>Unfortunately I am not tech savvy enough to build the site myself&#8230;As a result, I have also been soliciting like minded peers who are tech savvy enough to help me.</p>
<p>Through this process I have learned several things:</p>
<p>1) I wish I had learned more about web design / HTML</p>
<p>2) Lots o my peers / friends are tech savvy, brilliant at it even.</p>
<p>3) Many of these people have sites, make great music but see no noticeable  results due to their domain.</p>
<p>and 4) The reason for this I think is because the social networks have gained prominence over dedicated sites (for many reasons).</p>
<p>Strictly regarding &#8220;unknown&#8221; artists:</p>
<p>The social networks offer all the functions of a dedicated site with the added advantage of built in traffic. They offer convenience  and there are several that are &#8220;useful&#8221; (as opposed to the multitude that are not) like Last FM, iMeem, Amie Street, and even Myspace.</p>
<p>For the artist without a budget beyond a few hundred dollars a year to spare, the social networks offer a realistic and promising alternative to domain anonymity.</p>
<p>Google offers the most legitimate of the &#8220;free&#8221; options for web pages or blogs thanks to the way they structure the domain listings, i.e.:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ultrameek.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.ultrameek.blogspot.com</a></p>
<p>or</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ultrameek.googlepages.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.ultrameek.googlepages.com</a></p>
<p>Sure their brand is in the listing but they had the foresight to put the artist / bloggers name first. Unlike Myspace and many others who stick it on the end.</p>
<p>My point in saying all this is that I believe that there are very economical ways to create a web presence for your music (especially if you are HTML deficient like me).</p>
<p>A dedicated domain is always the way to go if you are capable. These alternatives mentioned above give folks like me complete control over our content and schedule of implementation.</p>
<p>I am not suggesting in any way that total control equals a great web presence (just visit any of those URL&#8217;s I posted!)&#8230;But that is the individuals responsibility to make it worthwhile&#8230;And I hope I develop those skills soon!</p>
<p>It is important to note: This is also the perspective of an artist with a full time day job, wife, and father of two with not a lot of time to spend making (much less) marketing music.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

