Introduction
I promised a radical change for New Music Strategies in 2008.
Here you go: it’s not a blog any more.
In 2006, I started a blog called New Music Strategies. I started writing about the rapidly changing media landscape, and how that was affecting independent artists and small music businesses. More importantly, it was about ways of understanding and navigating these changes, rather than being subject to them.
Along the way, I engaged with a good many people from the music business, many of whom shaped my thinking and gave me interesting case studies from around the world that challenged my preconceptions about what the online media environment offered, and what difficulties it raised. I gathered some of my ideas together and put out a little e-book that some people found helpful and interesting.
Over time, the readership of the blog grew. It seemed that this was a topic a lot of people were interested in. These are, after all, pressing issues for pretty much any band, independent label, promoter, venue owner, professional musician, publisher, broadcaster, music educator, retailer, equipment manufacturer, ticket outlet, performer, events organiser, studio owner, sound recordist and music consumer.
And the more people read the blog, the more feedback I received — and the more that feedback contributed to my thinking about the online music environment. I’ve had the opportunity to work through these things in a consultancy capacity, and the people I’ve worked with or presented to in that time have led me to believe that it’s been worth their while. And, of course, I’ve learned from all of these people — and it all goes into the pot.
I kind of feel like I have something of value to contribute as a result of all that. Something more than an occasional blog post could communicate effectively.
Self-assessment
My credentials for writing the blog in the first place were simply that it was a topic I was interested in, and I’m lucky enough to be passionate about something I can have as both a job and a hobby. My job, for the record (at least at the time of writing — who can predict the future?), is as Senior Lecturer and Degree Leader in the Music Industries at Birmingham City University. As part of my job, I teach about Online Music, how the Music Business works, Music Industries Skills, some Events Management, Music Programming for Radio and even a spot of Radio Drama, Documentaries and Features writing and production.
I’m also involved in research projects at the University. One of them concerns the ways in which online audiences interact with BBC music radio content. That’s a partnership with a couple of other universities and the BBC’s New Media and Technology Division. Another - a really big one - is called a Knowledge Transfer Fellowship. That’s a project in which a few of us go out to a bunch of local music and radio organisations and say ‘how can we be helpful?’. The idea is to help generate some innovative projects within industry that will help contribute to the economic and social aims of those organisations and, by extension, the wider local industry.
The blog, of course, is not part of the job. It’s nice that there’s overlap, but I like to keep them a bit separate. Life is complicated enough.
My background is in radio and the music business, as you might expect. I got into academia fairly late after a good decade as a broadcaster and sound engineer (I still consider myself a broadcaster, but I’m an ex-sound engineer), and later running a couple of media production companies and a jazz record label. I’ve also been a bit of a music collector for most of my life. These days, I tend to buy jazz vinyl (yes, off the internet), and sometimes people let me play records at bars and music festivals.
I don’t really consider myself a blogger. That’s not really what I do. That’s just how I happen to communicate what I do some of the time. I don’t consider myself a public speaker or a magazine columnist either, but these are also ways in which I think about this stuff out loud. I guess, if pressed, I’d call myself an educator, a communicator and a music fan. But that’s just because those are the things I’m most interested in doing, from a professional standpoint.
My actual skill, if I could be said to have one, is to join the dots. I try and step back, look at all the pieces, and try and think of interesting ways they could be connected up. Not much of a skill, as skills go - and I’d probably far rather not suck at playing guitar - but that’s what I have to work with.
So at the end of 2007, I asked the readers of New Music Strategies to go away and have a think about what it is they do, and to what end. The idea was, at the time, to try and get some clarity about where you’re at, so you can figure out where you’re headed and take the next step with some confidence.
But in truth, I was really asking that of myself.
What is it I actually do? What do I do it for?
And actually, it’s not that easy to come up with something definitive. But here’s what I came up with:
I describe and explain the internet for musicians and the people they work with, and I do it because I think that it’s helpful - both to them, and to people like me who like music a whole lot. I consider myself successful to the extent that people come back to me and say “Because of what you said, I now earn £X per month more than I was previously able, my attendances have gone up at gigs, and I can now do Thing X with my music that I always wanted to do…”
I like music people. Most of my friends come under that banner, I want to see them do well, and I recognise that it’s not easy to make that happen. Most of the musicians I know have spent more time than most brain surgeons in training for their profession, and they do it whether or not people will give them money.
And things are getting more challenging and confusing by the day, what with lawsuits about piracy, hyper-crowding on MySpace, new online services coming on board every day and copyright becoming an increasingly complex game. And now musicians are starting to feel compelled to either become computer experts, which that makes them either overwhelmed, resentful, or — at the other end of the spectrum — committed geeks like me — or to walk away from computers altogether.
But it’s not about becoming an IT specialist. It’s about knowing what’s around you and what you can use it for. Tools and contexts. Misunderstanding the online environment is, I believe, the main source of all the problems that the music industries currently face. Sure, greed and sheer bloody-mindedness play a part (and we can all think of examples of those things in the music biz these days), but the main problem is one of evolutionary wrongheadedness.
Online media ecology
Hang on - “evolutionary”?
Yep. The online world is part of our media environment. If your physical environment changes, and you adapt in response to that change, then you’re evolving. What you’re evolving into is probably something quite similar to what you were before, but with a specialism or a particular adaptation that (hopefully) gives you an edge in this changed environment. Ice Age? Grow fur. Lots of land predators? Grow wings. That sort of thing. Same deal here.
But growing fur is not an appropriate response to the introduction of predators to your ecosystem (unless they don’t like the taste). Chances are, you’ll be too hot and heavy to run, and you’ll still get eaten. Likewise, to misread the changes to the media environment as a result of the introduction of digital and networked technologies could lead to disastrous consequences. Whatever the musical business equivalent of getting eaten alive and having your furry bits spat out might be - well, pretty much that.
Okay, so it’s a metaphor. But these metaphors help us to understand and cope with changes as they face us. They help us make sense of the universe. As Robert Stetson Shaw said*, “You don’t see something until you have the right metaphor to let you perceive it”.
So my point (and I do have one) is that there’s clearly a role for me here. I have a bunch of useful metaphors, a handful of interesting approaches and a clear desire for things to be better than they currently are for you, the independent music person.
‘New’ New Music Strategies
Like I said, I don’t really think of myself as a blogger or a public speaker, so it’s not really that important to me if I keep blogging or giving seminars. But I do think of myself as a communicator, and these seem like fun things to do (especially when encouraged to do so with travel and cash), so I’ll carry on until someone tells me to stop. But making these realisations about what I’m up to and why I’m doing it has given a much clearer purpose to New Music Strategies.
Yes, it happens to be ‘in blog form’ right at this moment, but that might just be a useful way to communicate something that goes beyond the typical episodic short-form observation. In fact, something more similar to a book (at least in size and scope) might be in order, because some of these ideas require a fair bit of development and working through.
You won’t have to change anything about the way you read or subscribe to New Music Strategies. It’s still at this web address, and it will still arrive via RSS. This is still the internet, and we use the rules of the environment. In that respect, it’s clearly not a book — but from here on out, I’m going to write it as if it is one.
So - if it was a book, what sort of book would it be?
A practical one, certainly. One that drew on some of my educational background, research into the online media environment, and work with the music industries. One that took the new media environment for what it was, and not simply explained it, but developed some genuinely new strategies for businesses, bands and enterprises like yours that used that environment to get ahead of the game, adapt and thrive.
But I’m kind of glad it’s not a book in the traditional sense - because this way, although we can think about it as if it was something of that nature, I can also involve you in the creation of it. If it was a book, I’d go and lock myself in a room for a year or two, and come back with a text and present it as a fait accompli. And you’d look at it and think ‘meh - seen it before’.
I want to write this “book” (okay, that’s the last time I’m using airquotes - you know what I mean) for you and with you. I want you to tell me what sort of things you’re trying, what sort of challenges you’re facing, what sort of music business you’re attempting, what sort of technologies you’re struggling with, what sort of growth you’re striving for and what it is you do for a living.
Because it’s no longer a blog in the traditional sense, I’m not just going to be writing short observations, posting links to new and interesting things and saying ‘Look: shiny!’ (that’s what New Music Ideas is for). I’m going to be researching and writing something very like a book with your assistance.
On the downside, it won’t be as easy to read in the bath as a traditional book, and I’ll be writing it as you’re reading it, so it may not be as brilliantly structured as something that had a couple of dozen revisions. Maybe once we’ve got something that looks sort of finished, we can knock it into some sort of shape at the time. Perhaps.
On the plus side, it’s immediate, free, and intended to be as applicable, practical and helpful as possible. More helpful, certainly than New Music Strategies has been to date. Like most blogs, New Music Strategies has been necessarily impressionistic and a bit attention-deficit. It would hop from topic to topic on a whim, and aimed at best to be generally interesting, maybe occasionally useful.
It was all ‘this is what I’m thinking about right now’ rather than ‘this is the stuff that I’ve been working through for the past couple of years’. In other words, that was the warm up. This is the real deal.
I know I’ve made noises about a podcast, audiobooks, that sort of thing. That will come certainly (and I appreciate the music submissions and enquiries), but that’s not the primary focus right now. I’ve spent the past month with the big piece of paper, mapping out how I can best be helpful, and I’m convinced now, that this is it.
I can listen to you, I can work through this stuff with you, I can describe the environment and explain some of its features and terrain, I can do a spot of coaching on the entrepreneurial stuff, and I can connect the dots between what you’re good at and what’s now possible.
So - this is it. New Music Strategies is evolving, and - if you’re interested - you’re along for the ride. I’m looking forward to what we’ll come up with.
Thanks for reading.
________________________
*quoted in James Gleick, Chaos: Making a New Science, Viking, New York, 1987. p. 262






10 Comments, Comment or Ping
km
Another great post Andrew. So are you hinting that your NMS posts will be more infrequent to allow you to write longer, fleshed-out pieces that might become book chapters? Reminds me of how Chris Anderson’s “Long Tail” evolved from an article, to a blog and discussion forum, to a book. Keep up the good work and best of luck in 2008. Hope to see you soon in the Washington DC area.
Kaushik
Jan 2nd, 2008
James Rhodes
Andrew,
I think this is great. I love that you’re looking at this as a way to write a book that we all need, with interactive help, addressing the topics we are working on at the moment. I look forward to sharing all the projects that I am working on and implementing with my own company FIXT Music.
To start that off - I’d like to put a call out for a discussion about the best shopping cart software for indie musicians/labels to utilize online sales of both physical products and digital delivery. We are currently using a PRO account with 1shoppingcart.com and have been selling digital downloads directly from our store for about 1 year.
I’d also like to share an idea that we’ve been implementing for a few months now:
Because we have the ability to sell digital products, and we also sell physical items (CDs, T-Shirts, Posters, etc…) we have begun to combo digital bonus products as immediate downloads when a customer purchases a physical item. So if they buy a T-Shirt, they might get 3 free mp3’s upon checkout. Or if they purchase a CD, they’ll get an exclusive bonus track from that artist, not available on the CD, etc…You can check out our store at http://store.fixtmusic.com
What are other indie labels/store doing along these lines?
Jan 2nd, 2008
wallofsound
And about bloody time!
Jan 2nd, 2008
J Bluevibe
Looking forward to the next stage of NMS and it’s development in to something more focused and well, real. Like most people I read the blog, drop a few comments, check the other blogs to keep up to date with the latest ideas and theories on where the industry is going and try to put some of these ideas in to place for my studio and artists. For me it becomes reality when my music gets heard and maybe even bought by a new audience, when the ideas and theories on screen walk in to my studio and sit down for a jam. Lets enjoy the ride people, cheers Dubber.
Jan 2nd, 2008
Laura Harley
Congratulations, Andrew! I am thrilled for you in your decision to move forward on your path and it sounds like you are more committed to your purpose than ever. Very inspiring for all of us artists who follow your advice! Your suggestions have been tremendously helpful to me, and I know this living book will be even more so. A million thank yous for all the time, effort, support, understanding, and advice you give to independent artists.
Jan 2nd, 2008
Michael Winger
Like many other music professionals, I have involved myself in about 20 different roles over my 18+ years in the music business. Mostly I call myself a music producer, because it seems to be the most broadly undefined category available. I’m also a writer, a musician, a performer, a band leader and occasional theorist on the music business.
After reading your last two posts, I have spent the last few days writing down and categorizing all the things that I do. It has opened up a lot of insight into how I spend my time, and I am finding as much clutter in my activities as I find in the junk drawer at my studio. (Perhaps those two are related)
I first categorized my list into Learning, Writing, Performing, Collaborating and Relaxing (with lots and lots of subcategories). I then realized that most of these categories fell into the broader concepts of Creating, Selling and Maintaining.
What I am finding difficult is bridging the gap between Creating (songs, writing, performances, recordings, etc) and Selling (earning money from these creations). Both Creating and Selling seem to involve a lot of overwhelming maintenance for each. And I think I am someone who defines himself as a creator first, a maintainer 2nd, and a seller as a distant 3rd. But my goal for the year is to bring these elements together a bit more, or better still, delegate the selling and maintaining to others.
It seems that the more I collaborate with other people, the easier it is to do all three though. So a large part of the effort this year will be focused on projects that I can work on with others. A new band and possibly starting a new label for the artists I work with (if I can find someone to launch it with who wants to do the selling part…)
Good luck on the new version of the site. I’ve beeen an avid reader for the past few months and I’m looking forward to more of your useful nuggets of wisdom. Happy New Year!
Jan 2nd, 2008
Karen Hunter
Great stuff - looking forward to it - will spread the word to my friends and fellow students about your latest project.
I appreciate your artistry in writing about the online environment for musicians and music industry professionals. you are creating a living breathing beasty in here that compels me to return again and again for injections.
I have followed some of your suggestions already, and I am enjoying not following some of them too! As you are putting these ideas into words it liberates me to do just the opposite as well. I am personally working with the idea of having more than one website - one for personal stuff, and one for my ‘career’ - which is what you seem to do. I think it’s a great idea and will be working on putting this into action shortly.
your students are very lucky! thank you!
k
Jan 3rd, 2008
garagespin
Awesome. Super idea. Funny, I started outlining a “how to” series of posts for basic online tasks for new bands, that could become an eventual book…your idea is FAR more interesting.
(Then I realized that I’d only completed a single song in 12 months, and have no business taking on new projects…but we’ll see.) Looking forward to following your exploits, Andrew!
-Mike
Jan 6th, 2008
Eric
Frantically trying to adapt my ideas of how to deliver a short (17 week) course in Contemporary popular music I found this enterprise, and thank th’ lord for that!
As a youth-in the dark ages I guess according to the young folk I work with in FE - I was an avid NME reader, I knew what was going on (in the areas I cared about!) and I bought albums, dismissed “pop” music and the TOTP chart-ness of UK radio, but fevered away over Bob Harris and John Peel shows late night trying to “get” what “real” music was about. Wow! Thank goodness for NMS!
I’m still interested.
I’m keen to learn.
I am an educator by paid profession.
I teach folk stuff.
I am interested in learning how to keep up, and aspire to be able to master some new tricks now and then!
So, back to the comment. Yes we all need to do this life audit thing you describe so elegantly in the posts here and I am now a reader of “the Book”and I hope to be able to adapt the ideas and paper-based concepts of student teaching and learning materials into aomething a little different, to see how it works for me - and the students.
Any contributions would be welcomed. I want to ask them to record their answers rather than write me essays or reports where possible, and want to suggest a pod cast as their final project task.
I am aiming to keep things fresh as it were, and work from the idea of approaching this (media studies) course from the PoV of “an examination of the production, consumption and social context” of contemporary popular music, and that means asking what are they doing to produce and consume their music? I can give the sociological and socio-political background, that’s easy enough; but I know they are not interested in the sociology, politics or historical contexts much. I want to get them into the analysis of what they consume - and in some cases - produce themselves, by another route. NMS has provided the can opener here and the worms are about to be released (I hope!)
All power to your considerable elbow!
Jan 30th, 2008
Reply to “Introduction”