Onliner Notes      

There’s one thing an mp3 won’t replace for the music fan — and that’s the liner notes. Why the hell not?

liner notesWhen people talk about the loss of the physical artefact in online music, they’re often talking about the liner notes. The information, artwork and explanatory or exploratory essays that accompany a good record. And they’re right.

You might get the front cover of the album in the ID3 tag of your music file — or even a link to a review of the record, but it’s not the whole booklet, and nor is it the extra artwork and back cover.

I mean, just because you can’t hold the paper in your hands, doesn’t mean you shouldn’t get all that interesting and desirable stuff, right? In fact, in these days of user-generated content, wikis and rss feeds, shouldn’t you actually be able to get more?

Sometimes when I listen to music, I like to read about the music as it plays. But even though a website isn’t right for that — for a great many reasons — the characteristics of the online environment, and the nature of digital files, still suggest that metadata should be a key feature of the experience of digital music.

It isn’t.

If you’re lucky, you’ll get the front cover, artist name, year, album title and tracklist — equivalent to two sides of a single square of paper slotted into a CD jewel case. Disappointing stuff.

But what if you could get ALL of the information — and more?

Producer credits, explorations and analyses of individual songs, accompanying essays, photography from the recording session, personnel listings — and then fan- and expert-created content as well. All in a nice, easy to flick through package on your computer screen or portable player.

It wouldn’t be that hard to do. I propose a web(2.0)-based platform — possibly even a wiki — that allows for the entry of data of that sort of nature that can be easily exported to an XML file that can be downloaded and either (a) embedded in the file itself, (b) stored in a local folder or (c) accessible online at the point of playback.

A centralised server for that sort of thing — a bit like CDDB (or even Gracenote themselves) — would be the order of the day.

The way to do it from a consumption perspective would be through the installation of a small piece of software that would scan the ID3 tag of the song currently playing, and locate within it a URL for the XML file (perhaps kept in the under-utilised ‘comments’ field). The XML file would contain the pure data that would make up the content of the liner notes to be displayed. These would be quickly downloaded and imported.

Because XML data contains no style or presentation information (unlike HTML), the application itself would then present the liner notes in a format that was appropriate to the viewer. Different skins, if you like. The content could be presented in any way you see fit: a simple black on white text page that echoed a CD insert booklet, a glossy art photography book layout, a flash animated skin in which the pages turn like a ‘real’ book, and so on.

You might prefer a Def Jam presentation approach, where I might want my liner notes to look like Impulse! sleeves of the late 60s. Or you could assign different skins to different genres.

Reissue labels could provide extensive notes to accompany their releases. Major labels could embed the entire booklet of their latest CDs on the iTunes download without recourse to clunky PDF files. Allmusic.com could port their content to the project. Fans could upload and edit their own discussions of the album. Independent labels could mobilise their fan base to contribute text and image content.

Premium content sites could commodify ‘authorised’ sleeve art, as well as significant, high quality liner notes for an ever-expanding library of music. Moreover, the service would be easily backward-compatible with a simple initial scan of the user’s music directory, and a download and embed of the right XML files (or links thereto) into the correct fields of the ID3 tags within the existing music library.

And, of course, you’d be able to select exactly what sort of liner notes you were interested in. If you wanted the essays that the Observer Music Monthly would start contributing, you’d select (or subscribe to) that. If you didn’t want fan-generated explanations of the importance of the record to their own personal life journey, then you could just filter that out. Customisable record sleeves.

As the systems would all use XML for the data, all of the different services would be entirely interoperable. You could choose to opt in to any number of the services that would grow to support such a project, and they would just work together.

Some smart cookie might even code something in Ajax so you could drag and drop sections of text and image to create your own personalised presentation of an album’s metadata. And the information could always be expanded, refined and updated, with the help of our dear friend, RSS.

Personally, I’d like to see the Open Source community do something with this — from both a software development and a content provision perspective.

But there’s a market for all the smart people in business enterprise to come up with clever ways of displaying and interacting with that content. A sexy ‘Onliner Notes’ interface for the iPod for a £10 download. I’d buy that. Or perhaps a bit of software that displays the XML content as if it was a classic gatefold record sleeve. Wouldn’t that be perfect for those widescreen laptops?

It’s an overdue idea, as far as I can see. It’s an opportunity for record companies to reinvest their music with a collectiblity and value that goes beyond the value of the song-in-itself, and begins to recognise the value that consumers associate with their own investment in the collection, organisation and conceptual mapping of their own music.

Why is music free? Perhaps in part because the digital music file exists as audio data, floating contextless among the Word documents, jpegs and other data floating around the average hard drive. As such, it has a much lower degree of resonance within the ‘lifeworld’ of the consumer.

Liner notes provide the opportunity to situate that music. Provide it with the context that will allow consumers to attribute cultural value to the music. And that’s a good deal of the reason people like to buy vinyl. Quite literally, it means more to them.

Let’s invest mp3s with some of that.


Download Andrew Dubber's new book Music in the Digital Age - or, if you already have and you've been enjoying it or finding it useful, please consider paying for it here
 


2 Trackbacks

You can leave a trackback using this URL: http://newmusicstrategies.com/2007/03/01/onliner-notes/trackback/

  1. By 2007: Year in Review at New Music Strategies on December 22, 2007 at 8:46 pm

    [...] Onliner Notes This is something I feel quite strongly about: digital downloads do not sufficiently address the [...]

  2. [...] notes I wrote a blog post a long time ago about the ways in which information such as essays, recording session information, [...]

10 Comments

  1. I’m sceptical.. I want a tangible solution – onscreen doesn’t do it for me. I’ve been wracking my brains lately for a physical solution to this problem, that wouldn’t just end up as a scrap of paper on a shelf. Another problem for your students, perhaps?

    Posted March 1, 2007 at 5:08 am | Permalink
  2. I think that this is very true, although I never really read the additional information contained within CDs, but obviously there are consumers out there that would benefit from this online.

    Posted March 2, 2007 at 11:06 am | Permalink
  3. Part of the reason that I still buy CD’s is for the artwork itself, as I like to see the lyrics, the people the band has reason to thank and the intricate art or photographs they use to grab your attention. Whilst this is a good idea to redevelop the booklet concept for an online market, personally I still love the paper format, but would have to see this in practice before being swayed.

    Posted March 2, 2007 at 11:07 am | Permalink
  4. I am not really interested in getting any additional information about a song, however there is obviously people out there who do have an interest in this. A good solution to finding information online would be as of interest to many people.

    Posted March 2, 2007 at 11:08 am | Permalink
  5. Its not a TOTAL solution to what you propose, but I think you should try Songbird. Its marketed as a digital jukebox/web browser ‘mash-up’, and has not long been released, so the scope for improvement is massive.

    I wrote a small article about it here which you are free to read to discover more.

    The current stage of this program is still in ‘developer preview’, and still has a wealth of features to keep even the average internet user happy. 9 hours before I wrote this, I would have told you that this program was not compatible with an iPod, however, Erik Staats of Songbird has just released an extensionthat allows you to mount your iPod into songbird, and even load songs to and from your iPod.

    Back to the issue however, there are a wealth of add-ons for Songbird, a lot of which do the leg-work in finding out artist information while you enjoy the music. I’m currently content with the Wikipedia extension for it, it simply displays that particular artists’ Wikipedia website. The only flaw with this extension is that if you are listening to a relatively niche artist, he/she/they might not be on-line as of yet.

    However, the program is always developing, so keep an eye out for it, and the problem (which i’m sure not just you are experiencing)may just be solved.

    Posted March 2, 2007 at 11:15 am | Permalink
  6. I don’t see why this idea couldn’t work. I feel the liner notes are a really important when it comes to owning an album, and we could do with a lot more than the basic information if we downloaded it. Yes, it’s not the same as actually physically having the liner notes, but it’s better than nothing

    Posted March 2, 2007 at 11:15 am | Permalink
  7. I definitely agree to the fact that considering the number of ways we can transfer and share information (including RSS), online music store could improve their products in providing extra about the artist or the band you bought the music from. I will appreciate obtain more information such as lyrics, press release, images or any other media content related to the music I purchase.

    Posted March 2, 2007 at 11:19 am | Permalink
  8. I worked for a reissue label. We had bundles of stuff from the licensors archives that would have been priceless to the people who were buying our releases; which they doubtless already owned in other forms anyway! We were able to include bits and bobs in sleeve notes but there was plenty more in the vaults, letters, tape logs, original press sheets etc. Getting volumes of that stuff out there would have enhanced our products no end.
    The “lovingly repackaged and enhanced” marketing strapline and niche market business model will doubtless result in solutions to this problem evolving.
    I brought all the 25 anniversary issues of one of my top artists albums and they were indeed enhanced but i know there’s more I would be interested in. And yes, I would pay to see it. But in what form? Online? Only in a very few cases.
    If your lucky though some fanatic will have set up a system where fans can contribute material (gig tickets, flyers, set lists) etc to archives on a website and your musical life will be that bit more complete.
    Perhaps a “You Tube” for press cuttings, scans of tickets and flyers etc. I’d be logging on and sharing my the dust colleting cultural capital. All very well reading a transcript of a fanzine interview from ’85 but i’d rather see a scan of how it appeared first time complete with beer stains…and as an illustration of this point i suddenly remember that my myspace picture is a photo of an advert for the 1989 Reading Festival – that’s what i want people to know about me. I was there!

    Posted March 2, 2007 at 9:26 pm | Permalink
  9. Interestng idea – but somehow I doubt ID3 Tags will be the solution. There are some different approaches worth looking into:

    Musicbrainz – http://musicbrainz.org – identifies songs by audio fingerprinting and eventually wants to become something like the Wikipedia for audio metadata. People already started annotating lots of albums and songs. Granted, this won’t replace the original liner notes for works that have been released already, but maybe a smaller, innovative label could experiment with actually publishing liner notes here.

    Lucas Gonze – http://gonze.com/about – has been working on the idea of XML metadata for audio files for a while. Here’s an audio recording of an interesting presentation he recently did about this subject in Los Angeles:

    http://belkin.com/barcamp/audio/20061112-153616.wav
    http://belkin.com/barcamp/audio/20061112-144358.wav

    Posted March 7, 2007 at 5:38 pm | Permalink
  10. Rob

    issuu.com is a new company that converts PDF books into a very clean flash-based presentation (like actually flipping through pages). Of course, you would have to create a PDF booklet first, but it’s a start. Also, they load pretty fast!

    Posted December 29, 2007 at 7:07 pm | Permalink

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*